Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Exp Med. Dec 20, 2023; 13(5): 123-133
Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123
Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123
Table 5 Representation of attitude towards World Health Organization Access, Watch, Reserve classification among healthcare professionals
| Question | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree |
| Should AWaRe be used in the hospital? | 18 (19.4%) | 2 (2.2%) | 21 (22.6%) | 33 (35.5%) | 19 (20.4%) |
| AWaRe reduces adverse effects of inappropriate prescription | 12 (12.9%) | 5 (5.4%) | 25 (26.9%) | 32 (34.4%) | 19 (20.4%) |
| AWaRe threatens a clinician's autonomy | 9 (9.7%) | 35 (37.6%) | 35 (37.6%) | 11 (11.8%) | 3 (3.2%) |
| It can delay treatment | 16 (17.2%) | 37 (39.8%) | 28 (30.1%) | 8 (8.6%) | 4 (4.3%) |
- Citation: Negi G, KB A, Panda PK. Ground level utility of Access, Watch, Reserve classification: Insights from a tertiary care center in North India. World J Exp Med 2023; 13(5): 123-133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315X/full/v13/i5/123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123