Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Crit Care Med. Oct 16, 2019; 8(6): 87-98
Published online Oct 16, 2019. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v8.i6.87
Published online Oct 16, 2019. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v8.i6.87
First author, Year | Study type | Population | Circuit (VA/VV) | CRRT | Bolus dose (mg/kg) | Initial infusion (mg/kg/min) | Monitoring | Duration | Major bleeding | Thrombosis | Other adverse events | Outcome |
Jyoti et al[21], 2013 | Case report | 54M ARDS, HIT | VV | No | NA | 0.6 | ACT 200-220 s aPTT 60-80 s | 552 h (23 d) | NA | NA | NA | |
Pappalardo et al[23], 2009 | Case report | 71F post-cardiotomy, HIT | VA | No | 0.5 | 0.5 | ACT 180-220 s | 6 d | NA | Ventricular fibrillation due to LA thrombus, suspected to be due to heparin in tubing with residual HIT. BIV dosing increased | NA | Decannulated and discharged in stable condition |
Pieri et al[24], 2013 | Case control | n = 10 (4 HIT) | VV (n = 5) VA (n = 5) | n = 7 (70%) | N/A | 0.025 | aPTT 45-60 s | 8 d (range 6-23) | n = 3 (30%) | n = 1 (10%) | No difference in bleeding or thrombosis compared to UFH patients Less dose corrections than UFH Less supra-therapeutic aPTTs than UFH | n = 4 (40%) died |
Berei et al[20], 2018 | Retrospective | n = 44 CS (n = 37) Sepsis (n = 11) Respiratory (n = 3) Mixed (n = 4) | VA (n = 26) VV (n = 2) | n = 17 (39%) | UFH 80 units/kg at cannulation No BIV bolus | 0.04 | aPTT 45-65 s (low intensity) or 60-80 s (high intensity) | 156.9 h (mean) | n = 20 (45.5%) | n = 10 (22.7%) | Increased flow rates during first 96 h High intensity BIV had more TTR with no difference in outcomes | No difference in death at 30 d between BIV and UFH (36% vs 32%) |
Netley et al[22], 2017 | Retrospective | n = 11 ARDS (n = 8) ECLS (n = 3) | VA (n = 4) VV (n = 7) | n = 4 (36%) | NA | 2.5 | aPTT 40-60 s, 50-70 s, or 60-80 s | Mean 9.9 d (range 4-22) | n = 8 (72.7%) | n = 2 (18.2%), both after hospital discharge | NA | n = 5 (45%) died after withdrawal of care n = 6 (55%) discharged from hospital |
Ranucci et al[25], 2011 | Retrospective | n = 8, post-cardiotomy | VA | NA | NA | 0.03-0.05 ½ dose if reduced CrCl | ACT 160-180 s or aPTT 50-80 s or TEG r 12-30 min | 39-262 h | NA | None | Bleeding not reported, but less average blood loss (mL/kg/d) in BIV patients | n = 2 (25%) survived n = 2 (25%) dead on ECMO n = 4 (50%) weaned but died |
Walker et al[26], 2019 | Retrospective | n = 14 ARDS (n = 12) Post-cardiotomy (n =2) HIT (n = 11/13) | VV (n = 11) VA (n = 3) | n = 6 (43%) | 0.2 (n = 1, others NA) | 0.04-0.26 | aPTT 1.5-2.5 × baseline | Median 5.2 d (range 0.9-28.4 d) | n = 4 (29%) | Circuit clotting (n = 5, 36%) | Infusion held during major bleeding episodes with no need for correction Higher infusion rates noted with CRRT | n = 9 (64%) decannulated n = 7 (50%) survived to discharge |
- Citation: Burstein B, Wieruszewski PM, Zhao YJ, Smischney N. Anticoagulation with direct thrombin inhibitors during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. World J Crit Care Med 2019; 8(6): 87-98
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v8/i6/87.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v8.i6.87