Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Crit Care Med. Oct 16, 2019; 8(6): 87-98
Published online Oct 16, 2019. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v8.i6.87
Table 2 Summary of studies reporting on argatroban in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
First author, YearStudy typePopulationCircuit (VA/VV)CRRTBolus dose (mg/kg)Initial infusion (mg/kg/min)MonitoringDurationMajor bleedingThrombosisOther adverse eventsOutcome
Jyoti et al[21], 2013Case report54M ARDS, HITVVNoNA0.6ACT 200-220 s aPTT 60-80 s552 h (23 d)NANANA
Pappalardo et al[23], 2009Case report71F post-cardiotomy, HITVANo0.50.5ACT 180-220 s6 dNAVentricular fibrillation due to LA thrombus, suspected to be due to heparin in tubing with residual HIT. BIV dosing increasedNADecannulated and discharged in stable condition
Pieri et al[24], 2013Case controln = 10 (4 HIT)VV (n = 5) VA (n = 5)n = 7 (70%)N/A0.025aPTT 45-60 s8 d (range 6-23)n = 3 (30%)n = 1 (10%)No difference in bleeding or thrombosis compared to UFH patients Less dose corrections than UFH Less supra-therapeutic aPTTs than UFHn = 4 (40%) died
Berei et al[20], 2018Retrospectiven = 44 CS (n = 37) Sepsis (n = 11) Respiratory (n = 3) Mixed (n = 4)VA (n = 26) VV (n = 2)n = 17 (39%)UFH 80 units/kg at cannulation No BIV bolus0.04aPTT 45-65 s (low intensity) or 60-80 s (high intensity)156.9 h (mean)n = 20 (45.5%)n = 10 (22.7%)Increased flow rates during first 96 h High intensity BIV had more TTR with no difference in outcomesNo difference in death at 30 d between BIV and UFH (36% vs 32%)
Netley et al[22], 2017Retrospectiven = 11 ARDS (n = 8) ECLS (n = 3)VA (n = 4) VV (n = 7)n = 4 (36%)NA2.5aPTT 40-60 s, 50-70 s, or 60-80 sMean 9.9 d (range 4-22)n = 8 (72.7%)n = 2 (18.2%), both after hospital dischargeNAn = 5 (45%) died after withdrawal of care n = 6 (55%) discharged from hospital
Ranucci et al[25], 2011Retrospectiven = 8, post-cardiotomyVANANA0.03-0.05 ½ dose if reduced CrClACT 160-180 s or aPTT 50-80 s or TEG r 12-30 min39-262 hNANoneBleeding not reported, but less average blood loss (mL/kg/d) in BIV patientsn = 2 (25%) survived n = 2 (25%) dead on ECMO n = 4 (50%) weaned but died
Walker et al[26], 2019Retrospectiven = 14 ARDS (n = 12) Post-cardiotomy (n =2) HIT (n = 11/13)VV (n = 11) VA (n = 3)n = 6 (43%)0.2 (n = 1, others NA)0.04-0.26aPTT 1.5-2.5 × baselineMedian 5.2 d (range 0.9-28.4 d)n = 4 (29%)Circuit clotting (n = 5, 36%)Infusion held during major bleeding episodes with no need for correction Higher infusion rates noted with CRRTn = 9 (64%) decannulated n = 7 (50%) survived to discharge