Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2018; 7(2): 31-38
Published online May 4, 2018. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v7.i2.31
Published online May 4, 2018. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v7.i2.31
Scenario | Role | Bolus (% of total) | Vasoactive (% of total) | Other (% of total) | P value |
1-septic shock with ongoing losses | Non-experts1 (n = 438) Experts1 (n = 52) | 40 | 47 | 13 | 0.02 |
25 | 50 | 25 | |||
2-worsening hemodynamics after intubation | Non-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52) | 21 | 59 | 20 | 0.08 |
11 | 73 | 16 | |||
3-shock in a child known to have cardiomyopathy | Non-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52) | 39 | 15 | 46 | 0.77 |
42 | 17 | 41 | |||
4-recovering anaphylactic shock with low CVP | Non-experts (n = 438) Experts (n = 52) | 29 | 21 | 50 | 0.01 |
25 | 8 | 67 |
- Citation: Morparia K, Berg J, Basu S. Confidence level of pediatric trainees in management of shock states. World J Crit Care Med 2018; 7(2): 31-38
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v7/i2/31.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v7.i2.31