Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Crit Care Med. Nov 4, 2016; 5(4): 219-227
Published online Nov 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i4.219
Published online Nov 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i4.219
Functional outcomes | ΔKATZ | ΔMRC | |||||||||
AUC | Cut-off | Sensitivity | Specificity | P (Sig.) | AUC | Cut-off | Sensitivity | Specificity | P (Sig.) | ||
ICU | Age, yr | 0.664 | 78.5 | 41% | 42% | 0.001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
SAPS3, % | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.661 | 50.5 | 68% | 52% | 0.014 | |
KATZ at ICU admission, score | 0.515 | 4.5 | 47% | 58% | 0.753 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
MRC at ICU admission, score | 0.592 | 45.5 | 57% | 56% | 0.053 | 0.653 | 37 | 44% | 35% | 0.001 | |
Ward | Age, yr | 0.712 | 81.5 | 32% | 47% | < 0.001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
KATZ at ICU admission, score | 0.590 | 4.5 | 35% | 52% | 0.035 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
MRC at ICU admission, score | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.681 | 44.5 | 39% | 42% | < 0.001 | |
KATZ at ward admission, score | 0.746 | 2.5 | 63% | 12% | < 0.001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
MRC at ward admission, score | 0.721 | 47 | 69% | 67% | < 0.001 | 0.553 | 43.3 | 54% | 48% | 0.200 | |
Total | Age, yr | 0.592 | 81.5 | 38% | 52% | 0.058 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total length of stay, d | 0.617 | 11.5 | 51% | 72% | 0.016 | 0.649 | 10.5 | 54% | 73% | 0.001 | |
KATZ at ICU admission, score | 0.621 | 3.5 | 53% | 28% | 0.012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
KATZ at ward admission, score | 0.515 | 4.5 | 38% | 58% | 0.750 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
MRC at ward admission, score | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.696 | 37 | 51% | 35% | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ferreira NA, Lopes AJ, Ferreira AS, Ntoumenopoulos G, Dias J, Guimaraes FS. Determination of functional prognosis in hospitalized patients following an intensive care admission. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(4): 219-227
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v5/i4/219.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i4.219