Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Crit Care Med. Aug 4, 2016; 5(3): 171-179
Published online Aug 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i3.171
Published online Aug 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i3.171
Who should | Do what |
Institutions | Have a representative or an office for research integrity with highly visible contact details |
Inform magazines about cases of misconduct, in which the reliability of published data is doubtful | |
Respond to journals when requested for information on issues such as disputed authorship, questionable data quality, existing conflict of interest or other issues that could affect the reliability of the published works, including honest errors | |
Initiate investigations into allegations of scientific misconduct or unacceptable publication | |
Have guidelines to support responsible research and provisions for implementation of investigative procedures in cases of suspected scientific misconduct | |
Journals | Give the contact details of the publisher responsible for questions of research and publication integrity |
Inform institutions if they suspect that wrongdoing by their researchers and submit evidence which support these concerns | |
Cooperate with the institutions in question and in investigations suspected misconduct | |
Be ready to announce retraction or correction of publications according to the guidelines on COPE if investigations confirm misconduct | |
Have guidelines for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate suspected cases of scientific misconduct |
- Citation: Wiedermann CJ. Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(3): 171-179
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v5/i3/171.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i3.171