Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2016; 5(2): 165-170
Published online May 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165
Published online May 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165
Table 4 Analysis of sensitivity and specificity
| Variables and their usage for metrics | Sensitivity | Specificity | True positive | False positive | True negative | False negative |
| MV use (from M7) | 100% | 94.40% | 75 | 1 | 17 | 0 |
| NIV use (from M7) | 100% | 95.50% | 71 | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| ICU mortality (M8, M9) | 100% | 100% | 0 | 0 | 93 | 0 |
| In-hospital mortality | 100% | 100% | 10 | 0 | 83 | 0 |
- Citation: Dziadzko MA, Thongprayoon C, Ahmed A, Tiong IC, Li M, Brown DR, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(2): 165-170
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v5/i2/165.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165