Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Crit Care Med. Feb 4, 2016; 5(1): 57-64
Published online Feb 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.57
Published online Feb 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.57
Meta-analysis | n | Risk reduction (bleeding) | Risk reduction (mortality) |
Alhazzani et al[2] | 1720 | RR = 0.36 | RR = 1.01 |
(95%CI: 0.19-0.67) | (95%CI: 0.83-1.24) | ||
Pongprasobchai et al[59] | 569 | OR = 0.42 | n/a |
(95%CI: 0.20-0.91) | |||
Barkun et al[60] | 1587 | OR = 0.30 | OR = 1.19 |
(95%CI: 0.17-0.54) | (95%CI: 0.84-1.68) | ||
Lin et al[61] | 936 | RD = 0.04 | RD = 0.00 |
(95%CI: 0.09-0.01) | (95%CI: 0.04-0.05) |
- Citation: Buendgens L, Koch A, Tacke F. Prevention of stress-related ulcer bleeding at the intensive care unit: Risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(1): 57-64
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v5/i1/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.57