Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Crit Care Med. Nov 4, 2015; 4(4): 278-286
Published online Nov 4, 2015. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i4.278
Table 2 Recruitment maneuver methods and outcomes reported in the literature about experimental studies
Ref.PopulationDesignInterventionsComparisonOutcome
Rzezinski et al[23]Animals with mild extrapulmonary lung injuryRandomized experimental studyProlonged RM stepwise increase in PIP of 15-20-25 cm H2O above a PEEP of 15 cm H2O (maximal PIP = 40 cm H2O)(1) Animals ventilated with VT = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 5 cm H2O with no RMs; (2) Sustained inflation (40 cm H2O for 40 s); or (3) Stepwise increase in Paw of 15, 20, 25 cm H2O above a PEEP of 15 cm H2O (maximal PIP = 40 cm H2O), with interposed periods of Paw = 10 cm H2O above a PEEP = 15 cm H2OProlonged RM improved lung function, with less damage to alveolar epithelium, resulting in reduced pulmonary injury
Steimback et al[18]Animals with extrapulmonary lung injuryRandomized experimental studySigh with different PIP and frequencies(1) Animals ventilated with VT = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 5 cm H2O with no RMs; (2) Sustained inflation (40 cm H2O for 40 s); (3) RM (180 sighs/h) and PIP (40 cm H2O) (S180/40); (4) RM (10 sighs/h) and PIP (40 cm H2O) (S10/40); and (5) RM (10 sighs/h) and PIP (20 cm H2O) (S10/20)The reduction in sigh frequency led to a protective effect on the lung and distal organs
Silva et al[8]Animals with pulmonary and extrapulmonary lung injuryRandomized experimental studyStepwise RM (5 cm H2O/step, 8.5 s at each step during 51 s); Stepwise RM (5 cm H2O/step, 5 s at each step during 30 s)(1) Sustained inflation (30 cm H2O for 30 s; (2) Stepwise PIP increase 30 cm H2O over 51 s (STEP-51); and (3) Stepwise PIP increase over 30 s with maximum PIP sustained for a further 30 s (STEP-30/30)Stepwise RM prevented fibrogenesis and endothelial cell damage