Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2025; 14(2): 99975
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.99975
Table 2 Selected studies on communication strategies
Ref.
Study type
No. and age of patients
Focus
Key findings
Araujo et al[10], 2022Qualitative multi-case study4 adolescents and 4 health care professionalsCommunication strategiesDemonstrated that tailored strategies improved patient cooperation
Johnson et al[11], 2023ReviewPain communication scoping reviewShowed gaps in assessing pain communication in ASD children
Bell and Condren[12], 2016ReviewEmpowering communicationDemonstrated improved outcomes with structured language
Randi et al[13], 2010ReviewTeaching reading to ASD childrenAdvocated clear, concise instructions to improve learning
Arthur-Kelly et al[14], 2009ReviewVisual supportsHighlighted benefits of visual aids for communication in ASD
Swanson et al[15], 2020ReviewCaregiver speechShowed that caregiver involvement enhanced language comprehension
Amato and Fernandes[17], 2010Comparative observational study20 children, 2-10 yearsVerbal and non-verbal communicationExplored interactive communication methods
Tsang et al[18], 2019ReviewPrimary care managementAdvocated early intervention with communication-focused strategies
Forbes and Yun[36], 2023ReviewVisual support in activitiesHighlighted increased participation with visual aids
Knight and Sartini[45], 2015ReviewASD comprehension strategiesIdentified effective strategies for education settings
Palese et al[46], 2021Two-phase validation study141 children and adolescents, 6–16 yearsPain communication toolsValidated tools for pain assessment in non-verbal ASD children