Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2025; 14(2): 101587
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.101587
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.101587
Table 3 Summary of the performance, advantages, and limitations of various traditional and novel biomarkers of sepsis
Biomarkers | Overall performance for sepsis | Advantages | Limitations |
CRP | Pooled sensitivity 80% and pooled specificity 61% for BI in general[49] | Wide availability. Low cost | Low specificity for BI. Falsely low levels in liver failure. Lag time: 12-24 hours. False positive in inflammation |
PCT | Pooled sensitivity 77% and pooled specificity of 79% in general[53] | Easily available. Validated across multiple studies. Rapid elevation, 3–4 hours after BI | Modest to poor discriminatory role in liver failure patients. Varying cut-off levels. False positive in inflammation. Poor performance in renal failure and immunocompromised patients |
IL-6 | Pooled sensitivity 85% and specificity 91% for BI in cirrhosis[58] | Estimation is accurate, fast, and simple | It is a non-specific pro-inflammatory cytokine. Needs further studies in liver failure patients |
HDL-C | HDL-C has an inverse correlation with BI[65,66] | Simple test. Low-cost. Widely available | Inverse correlation also exists between HDL-C and liver disease per se. Needs further studies as a biomarker for sepsis |
Presepsin | Overall diagnostic sensitivity 83% and specificity 78%[59] | Better performance in liver failure patients than CRP and PCT[48]. Specific association with gram negative sepsis-Detectable within 2 hours of BI | Limited availability. Expensive test. More effective as an adjunct biomarker than when used alone. Requires further validation studies |
sTREM-1 | Pooled sensitivity 85% andspecificity 79% for differentiating sepsis from SIRS[61] | Early detection, < 2 hours after BI. Short half-life, making it useful for treatment response | Not routinely available. Varying cut-off levels. Requires further validation studies. Only modest performance when used alone |
Bacterial DNA testing | Next-Generation Sequencing methodenables the identification of all bacteria in the blood and body fluid[70,71] | Quick and wide-ranging detection of bacteria | Not routinely available. Primer cross-reactivity with human DNA. Limited specificityand inconsistent results. DNA without a live pathogen compromises interpretation |
sCD206 | Significant association with infection (AUROC 71%) and mortality in ALF (AUROC 81%)[63] | It is among few novel biomarker evaluated in ALF patients | Not routinely available for use. Levels also increases in fungal and viral infection.Requires further validation studies |
- Citation: Kumar R, Kumar A, Kumar S. Sepsis in liver failure patients: Diagnostic challenges and recent advancements. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(2): 101587
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i2/101587.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.101587