Opinion Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2025; 14(2): 101587
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.101587
Table 3 Summary of the performance, advantages, and limitations of various traditional and novel biomarkers of sepsis
Biomarkers
Overall performance for sepsis
Advantages

Limitations
CRPPooled sensitivity 80% and pooled specificity 61% for BI in general[49]Wide availability. Low costLow specificity for BI. Falsely low levels in liver failure. Lag time: 12-24 hours. False positive in inflammation
PCTPooled sensitivity 77% and pooled specificity of 79% in general[53]Easily available. Validated across multiple studies. Rapid elevation, 3–4 hours after BIModest to poor discriminatory role in liver failure patients. Varying cut-off levels. False positive in inflammation. Poor performance in renal failure and immunocompromised patients
IL-6Pooled sensitivity 85% and specificity 91% for BI in cirrhosis[58]Estimation is accurate, fast, and simpleIt is a non-specific pro-inflammatory cytokine. Needs further studies in liver failure patients
HDL-CHDL-C has an inverse correlation with BI[65,66]Simple test. Low-cost. Widely availableInverse correlation also exists between HDL-C and liver disease per se. Needs further studies as a biomarker for sepsis
PresepsinOverall diagnostic sensitivity 83% and specificity 78%[59]Better performance in liver failure patients than CRP and PCT[48]. Specific association with gram negative sepsis-Detectable within 2 hours of BILimited availability. Expensive test. More effective as an adjunct biomarker than when used alone. Requires further validation studies
sTREM-1Pooled sensitivity 85% andspecificity 79% for differentiating sepsis from SIRS[61]Early detection, < 2 hours after BI. Short half-life, making it useful for treatment responseNot routinely available. Varying cut-off levels. Requires further validation studies. Only modest performance when used alone
Bacterial DNA testingNext-Generation Sequencing methodenables the identification of all bacteria in the blood and body fluid[70,71]Quick and wide-ranging detection of bacteriaNot routinely available. Primer cross-reactivity with human DNA. Limited specificityand inconsistent results. DNA without a live pathogen compromises interpretation
sCD206Significant association with infection (AUROC 71%) and mortality in ALF (AUROC 81%)[63]It is among few novel biomarker evaluated in ALF patientsNot routinely available for use. Levels also increases in fungal and viral infection.Requires further validation studies