Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2024; 13(3): 92531
Published online Sep 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.92531
Figure 4
Figure 4 Reduction of Candida krusei monotipic biofilm (in %) calculated using the MTT test after treatment with experimental groups. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc test (n = 10, α = 0.05). Statistical significance is indicated as follows: aP ≤ 0.04 vs the control group and bP ≤ 0.0001 vs the control group. A: Candida krusei biofilm treated for 5 min with Cymbopogon schoenanthus at various concentrations; B: C. krusei biofilm treated for 24 h with Cy. schoenanthus at various concentrations; C: C. krusei biofilm treated for 5 min with Pelargonium graveolens at various concentrations; D: C. krusei biofilm treated for 24 h with P. graveolens at various concentrations.