Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2024; 13(1): 90746
Published online Mar 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.90746
Table 3 Summary of short-term postoperative volatile anesthetic studies
Ref.
Treatment
Surgeries
Sedation duration
Time to awakening/extubation
Other outcomes
Non-cardiac surgery
Bellgardt et al[3], 2019, Randomized trialIsoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10)Major surgery (aortic, pancreatic, esophagectomy, spinal fusion, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, necrotizing fasciitis)17.9 (16.6–20.6) hNRIsoflurane had longest awakening times followed by sevoflurane, with desflurane the shortest (open eyes, follow verbal commands, extubation, tell birthday). Desflurane was most expensive followed by sevoflurane, with isoflurane the cheapest (per hour)
Sevoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10)16.5 (10.4–37.4) hNR
Desflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 10)18.8 (14.1–33.8) hNR
Jung et al[27], 2020, Prospective interventionalSevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 25)Head and neck surgery with tracheostomy771 ± 338.4 minNRSevoflurane required less continuous opioid. Similar vasopressor use and length of stay
Propofol (n = 24)1508 ± 2074.7 minNR
Romagnoli et al[28], 2017, Prospective interventionalSevoflurane with MIRUS™ (n = 62)Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted noncardiac3.33 (2.33–5.75) h4 (2.2–5) min (awakening after drug cessation)No adverse effects. Pollution < 1 ppm at all timepoints assessed
Cardiac surgery
Hellström et al[29], 2011, Randomized trialSevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 50)Elective or subacute coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass176 minNRSevoflurane had less intense increase in troponin at 12 h. Similar hemodynamics and length of stay
Propofol (n = 50)221 minNR
Jerath et al[30], 2015, Randomized trialIsoflurane or sevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 67)Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypassNR182 (140–255) min (extubation after ICU arrival)No adverse effects. Similar hemodynamics and lengths of stay
Propofol (n = 74)NR292 (210–420) min (extubation after ICU arrival)
Röhm et al[31], 2008, Randomized trialSevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 35)Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass8.1 ± 3.5 h9.0 ± 4.0 h (extubation after ICU arrival)Sevoflurane had faster times of recovery after sedation cessation (eye opening, following commands, hand grip, and extubation). Similar ICU length of stay, sevoflurane with lower hospital length of stay
Propofol (n = 35)8.4 ± 4.2 h12.5 ± 5.8 h (extubation after ICU arrival)
Soro et al[32], 2012, Randomized trialSevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 36)Elective coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypassNRNRNo differences in postoperative cardiac biomarkers, hemodynamics, or lengths of stay
Propofol (n = 37)NRNR
Steurer et al[33], 2012, Randomized trialSevoflurane with AnaConDa (n = 46)Valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypassAt least 4 hNRSevoflurane had lower troponin T and creatine kinase concentrations on postoperative day 1
Propofol (n = 56)At least 4 hNR
Wąsowicz et al[34], 2018, Randomized trialIsoflurane (n = 30) or sevoflurane (n = 30) with AnaConDaElective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypassNR172.1 ± 175.5 min (extubation after ICU arrival)No difference in postoperative troponin values or ICU or hospital length of stay
Propofol (n = 67)NR219.6 ± 104.9 min (extubation after ICU arrival)