Adding vortexing to the Maki technique provides no benefit for the diagnosis of catheter colonization or catheter-related bacteremia

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

950

Tables (1-3)

235

Sum=1241

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

103

Download

258

Sum=361

Mar 9, 2024 (publication date) through Feb 7, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Critical Care Medicine

ISSN

2220-3141

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2024; 13(1): 89085
Published online Mar 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.89085

Table 3 Maki and vortexing results to diagnosis catheter-related bloodstream infection

Citation: Lorente L, Lecuona Fernandez M, González-Mesa A, Oliveras-Roura J, Rosado C, Cabrera P, Casal E, Jiménez A, Mora ML, Madueño A. Adding vortexing to the Maki technique provides no benefit for the diagnosis of catheter colonization or catheter-related bacteremia. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13(1): 89085
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v13/i1/89085.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.89085