Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2023; 12(4): 188-203
Published online Sep 9, 2023. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188
Published online Sep 9, 2023. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188
Ref. | Type of study | Patient population | Aim | No. of patients/studies | Results | Conclusion of study |
Ryu et al[52], 2015 | Observational | Adults | To compare changes in PCT and CRP concentration in critically ill septic patients to determine which marker better predicts outcome | 157 patients; 171 episodes | CPCTc and CRPc are significantly associated with treatment failure (P = 0.027 and P = 0.03 respectively) and marginally significant with 28 d mortality (P = 0.064 and 0.062 respectively). AUC for prediction of treatment success-PCTc-0.71 (95%CI: 0.61-0.81); CRPc-0.71 (95%CI: 0.61-0.81); AUC for survival prediction-PCTc-0.77 (95%CI: 0.66-0.88); CRPc-0.77 (95%CI: 0.67-0.88) | Changes in PCT and CRP concentrations were associated with outcomes of critically ill septic patients. CRP may not be inferior to PCT in predicting outcomes in these patients |
Patnaik et al[32], 2020 | Meta-Analysis | Adults | To evaluate the results of all non-clearance of serial PCT as a mortality predictor | 10 studies, 1974 patients | AUC varied between the studies between 0.52 and 0.86. Overall AUC-0.711 (95%CI: 0.662-0.760) under fixed effect model and 0.708 (95%CI: 0.648-0.769) under random effect model. Overall proportion of mortality-37.54% | PCT non clearance is a marker for increased mortality. Optimal cut off points for PCT non clearance in septic patients admitted to ICU are not known |
Park et al[53], 2013 | Observational | Adults | To evaluate the value of PCT in women with APN at ED | 240 | AUC for predicting 28 d mortality for PCT-0.68. For predicting mortality, a cut off value of 0.42 ng/mL, sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 50%. Disease classification systems were predicted to be superior to PCT in predicting 28 d mortality | By distinguishing the severity of sepsis related to APN mortality, PCT levels help clinicians in disease severity classification and treatment decisions at ED |
Oberhoffer et al[54], 1999 | Observational | Adults | To predict outcome with traditional and new inflammatory markers in septic patients | 242 | AUC for PCT was 0.878 which was highest as compared to other markers | PCT may be a better marker than other inflammatory markers, CRP, leukocyte count, body temperature to identify patients endangered by severe infection or sepsis |
Arora et al[31], 2015 | Meta-Analysis | Adults | To study the procalcitonin levels in survivors and non survivors of sepsis | 25 studies; 2353 patients | Mean difference in procalcitonin levels between survivors and non survivors on day 1 (P = 0.02) and day 3 (P = 0.03) was statistically significant | Significantly lower levels of procalcitonin were observed in survivors as compared to non survivors in early stages of sepsis |
- Citation: Ahuja N, Mishra A, Gupta R, Ray S. Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the Holy Grail or chasing a mirage! World J Crit Care Med 2023; 12(4): 188-203
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v12/i4/188.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188