Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Crit Care Med. Nov 9, 2022; 11(6): 364-374
Published online Nov 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i6.364
Published online Nov 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i6.364
Scoring system | AUC | P value | 95%CI | Cut off | Sensitivity | Specificity |
APACHE II | 0.688 | < 0.001 | 0.637-0.739 | > 18.5 | 67.5% | 62.7% |
APACHE III | 0.720 | < 0.001 | 0.672-0.769 | > 78.5 | 46.8% | 87.6% |
APACHE IV | 0.708 | < 0.001 | 0.659-0.758 | > 72.5 | 53.7% | 79.3% |
SAPS II | 0.734 | < 0.001 | 0.685-0.782 | > 34.5 | 76.2% | 60.4% |
SAPS III PDR | 0.762 | < 0.001 | 0.715-0.808 | 39.0 | 44.3% | 92.0% |
SOFA Score | 0.715 | < 0.001 | 0.665-0.764 | > 7.5 | 58.0% | 79.3% |
MPM II0 PDR | 0.762 | < 0.001 | 0.714-0.810 | 36.45 | 71.3% | 69.9% |
- Citation: Beniwal A, Juneja D, Singh O, Goel A, Singh A, Beniwal HK. Scoring systems in critically ill: Which one to use in cancer patients? World J Crit Care Med 2022; 11(6): 364-374
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v11/i6/364.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i6.364