Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Crit Care Med. May 9, 2022; 11(3): 169-177
Published online May 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169
Published online May 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169
Demographic variables | Responses in % (n = 121) |
Age (yr) | |
31-40 | 29.8 |
41-50 | 23.1 |
20-30 | 23.1 |
> 50 | 24.0 |
Gender | |
Male | 65.3 |
Female | 34.7 |
Intensive care unit experience (yr) | |
< 10 | 50.4 |
10-20 | 35.5 |
21-30 | 9.9 |
> 30 | 4.1 |
Designation | |
Consultant staff | 73.6 |
Resident-PGY-3 and above | 14.9 |
Resident-PGY-1 | 5.0 |
Resident-PGY-2 | 6.6 |
Intensive care unit specialty wise distribution | |
Mixed medical-surgical | 76.0 |
Medical | 7.4 |
Others | 16.6 |
Institution type | |
Private/non-academic | 16.5 |
Government hospital (tertiary care) | 19.8 |
Academic teaching hospital | 31.5 |
Corporate teaching hospital | 8.2 |
Other | 0.9 |
Number of intensive care unit beds | |
< 11 | 28.1 |
11-20 | 31.4 |
21-30 | 23.1 |
> 30 | 17.4 |
Intensive care unit type | |
Open | 43.8 |
Closed | 56.2 |
- Citation: Nawaz FA, Deo N, Surani S, Maynard W, Gibbs ML, Kashyap R. Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020. World J Crit Care Med 2022; 11(3): 169-177
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v11/i3/169.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169