Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2021; 10(5): 290-300
Published online Sep 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.290
Table 2 Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials and the Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness checklist for nonrandomized trials
Randomized-controlled trials
Ref.
Randomization
Deviation from the intended interventions
Missing outcome data
Measurement of outcome
Selection of the reported result
Overall
Bolvardi et al[17], 2016LowHighSome concernsLowSome concernsHigh
Mentzelopoulos et al[9], 2009LowLowLowLowLowLow
Mentzelopoulos et al[7], 2013LowLowLowLowLowLow
Paris et al[10], 1984HighLowSome concernsLowSome concernsHigh
Non-randomized-controlled trials
Ref.Adequate treatmentAdequate outcomesObjective outcomesValid outcomesSimilar outcomesCovariates recordedNew initiatorsConcurrent comparatorsCovariates accounted forImmortal time biasSensitivity analysis
D1D2D3D4D5D6M1M2M3M4M5
Tsai et al[11], 2007+++++++++++
Tsai et al[18], 2016+++++++++++