Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 82-98
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.82
Table 2 The recommended use times of different studies
YearRef.Instruments (rotary)nUsed timesOperatorDeformation (files)Separation (files)
2006Wolcott et al[77]ProTaper4652 canals1 toothExperienced20
2 teethExperienced12
3 teethExperienced23
4 teethExperienced19
5 teethExperienced39
2009Shen et al[75]ProFile 0.04,1071 files1 visitExperienced8 (0.75%)0
ProFile Series 29 0.04432 files1 visitExperienced00
ProTaper1895 files1 visitExperienced55 (2.9%)5 (0.26%)
2009Inan et al[7]Mtwo593 files4 molar teeth or 2 molar teeth with curved canals10 trained58 (9.78%) (unwinding and curve/bend)95 (16.02%)
2009Vieira et al[48]ProTaper Universal10 sets files5 molar teethExperienced00
2010Ma et al[74]ProTaper432 case20 canals27
2012Shen et al[53]ProFile Vortex2023 files1 visitUndergraduate students01 (0.04)
2013Shen et al[76]HyFlex CM468 files3 teeth9 residents16 (3.4%)0
2015Plotino et al[19]Reciproc1696 files1 tooth6 (0.35%)8 (0.47%)