Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 82-98
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.82
Table 1 The prevalence and incidence of files separation at different studies
YearRef.InstrumentnLevelLocationSeparation
1997Ramirez-Salomon et al[10]LightSpeed162CanalsMolars3.7%
52TeethMolars11.5%
2000Sattapan et al[11]Quantec Series 2000378FilesTooth21%
2003Al-Fouzan et al[12]Profile1457CanalsMolars1.4%
419TeethMolars5%
2003Hülsmann et al[13]Quantec Sc50CanalsMolars6%
25TeethMolars12%
LightSpeed50CanalsMolars10%
25TeethMolars20%
2004Ankrum et al[14]Profile59FilesMolars1.7%
Protaper84FilesMolars6.0%
K3 Endo48FilesMolars2.1%
2006Troian et al[15]RaCe50CanalsArtificial12%
K350CanalsArtificial0%
2006Iqbal et al[16]Hand and rotary instrument10237CanalsTooth0.09%
4116TeethTooth0.22%
Hand only1801CanalsTooth0.17%
749TeethTooth0.40%
Rotary instrument10237CanalsTooth0.67%
4116TeethTooth1.68%
2006Di Fiore et al[4]Profile2476FilesTooth0.28%
Protaper1689FilesTooth0.41%
GTRotary771FilesTooth0.39%
K3Endo1725FilesTooth0.52%
2006Knowles et al[8]LightSpeed3543CanalsTooth1.30%
2009Inan et al[7]Mtwo593FilesTooth16.2%
2009Shen et al[2,5]Profile3706FilesTooth0.3%
Protaper1895FilesTooth0.26%
Protaper for hand use280FilesTooth2.9%
K3294FilesTooth3%
2011Wu et al[17]Protaper6154CanalsTooth1.1%
2654TeethTooth2.6%
2013Gu et al[18]Protaper2061FilesTooth28.2%
2014Plotino et al[19]Reciproc3780CanalsTooth0.21%
1696FilesTooth0.47%
2014Labaf et al[20]Hero642233CanalsSimulated4.75%
FlexMaster92CanalsSimulated3.92%
Mtwo152CanalsSimulated6.33%
2014Wang et al[6]Mtwo24108CanalsTooth1.0%
11036TeethTooth2.2%
2014Ungerechts et al[3]Hand instruments3854TeethTooth1.0%