Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 142-146
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.142
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.142
Ref. | Technique (n) | Conversion (%) | Operative time (min, mean) | |||||
RG | LG | RG | LG | P value | RG | LG | P value | |
Baek et al[14] | 41 | 41 | 7.3 | 22 | NS | 296 | 315 | NS |
Baik et al[15] | 56 | 57 | 0 | 10.5 | 0.013 | 178 | 179 | NS |
Patriti et al[16] | 29 | 37 | 0 | 19 | < 0.05 | 202 | 208 | NS |
Bianchi et al[17] | 25 | 25 | 0 | 4 | NS | 240 | 237 | NS |
Park et al[18] | 41 | 82 | 0 | 0 | NS | 231.9 | 168.6 | < 0.001 |
Kwak et al[19] | 59 | 59 | 0 | 3.4 | NS | 270 | 228 | < 0.0001 |
Baek et al[20] | 154 | 150 | NA | NA | NA | 285.2 | 219.7 | 0.018 |
D'Annibale et al[21] | 50 | 50 | 0 | 6 | 0.011 | 270 | 275 | NS |
Kang et al[22] | 165 | 165 | 0.6 | 1.8 | NS | 309 | 277 | < 0.001 |
Tam et al[23] | 21 | 21 | 5 | 0 | NS | 260 | 240 | 0.04 |
-
Citation: Privitera A, Salem A, Elgendy K, Sabr K. Robotic surgery
vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer: Review of the literature. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(1): 142-146 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i1/142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.142