Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 119-126
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.119
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.119
Ref. | Total number | Reasons for excision |
of excisions | (% of total excision) | |
Farouk et al[21] Mayo Clinic n = 1508 | 14 | Pouch ischaemia (14.3%) |
Karoui et al[4] Cleveland Clinic n = 1241 | 68 | Pouch ischaemia (1.5%) Intra-abdominal bleeding (2.9%) Redo operation and insufficient length on mesentery (1.5%) |
Körsgen et al[12] Birmingham n = 180 | 23 | Pouch ischaemia (26.1%) |
Lepistö et al[8] Helsinki n = 486 | 24 | Adrenal insufficiency and dehydration (4.2%) Patients fear of incontinence after stomal closure (4.2%) Perianal pain (4.2%) |
Wexner et al[30] Minneapolis n = 180 | 14 | Severe post-operative haemorrhage (7.1%) |
- Citation: Byrne CM, Rooney PS. Ileo-anal pouch excision: A review of indications and outcomes. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(1): 119-126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i1/119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.119