Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 1-13
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1
Ref. | Year | Follow-up (yr) | n | Recurrence |
Said et al[67] | 1995 | 3.2 | 260 | 6.5% |
Platell et al[65] | 2004 | 1.5 | 62 | 2.4% |
Endreseth et al[60] | 2005 | 2 | 64 | 13% |
Whitehouse et al[71] | 2006 | 3.3 | 143 | 4.8% |
McCloud et al[63] | 2006 | 2.6 | 75 | 16% |
Guerrieri et al[86] | 2008 | 3.7 | 588 | 4.3% |
Speake et al[68] | 2008 | 1 | 80 | 12.5% |
Moore et al[64] | 2008 | 1.7 | 40 | 3% |
de Graaf et al[59] | 2009 | 2.3 | 309 | 6.6% |
Ramirez et al[66] | 2009 | 3.6 | 149 | 5.4% |
van den Broek et al[70] | 2009 | 1.1 | 248 | 9.3% |
Guerrieri et al[61] | 2010 | 7 | 402 | 4% |
Tsai et al[69] | 2010 | 2 | 156 | 5% |
de Graaf et al[58] | 2011 | 2.7 | 208 | 6.1% |
- Citation: Devaraj B, Kaiser AM. Impact of technology on indications and limitations for transanal surgical removal of rectal neoplasms. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(1): 1-13
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1