Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Surg Proced. Mar 28, 2015; 5(1): 1-13
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1
Ref. | Year | Follow-up (yr) | n | 5 yr local recurrence | 5 yr overall survival | |||
TAE | SR | TAE | SR | TAE | SR | |||
Endreseth et al[37] | 2005 | 2-8.1 | 35 | 256 | 12% | 6%1 | 70%1 | 80%1 |
You et al[42] | 2007 | 6.3 | 601 | 493 | 12.5% | 6.9%1 | 77% | 82% |
Ptok et al[40] | 2007 | 3.5 | 85 | 359 | 5.1%1 | 1.4%1 | 84% | 92% |
2Folkesson et al[38] | 2007 | NA | 256 | 1141 | 7% | 2%1 | 87% | 93% |
Hazard et al[39] | 2009 | 3.9 | 573 | 3040 | NA | NA | 71% | 84% |
2Saraste et al[41] | 2013 | NA | 448 | 3246 | 11.2% | 2.9% | 81% | 92% |
- Citation: Devaraj B, Kaiser AM. Impact of technology on indications and limitations for transanal surgical removal of rectal neoplasms. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(1): 1-13
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2832/full/v5/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.1