Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass

doi:10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6794)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

543

WORD

369

HTML

2703

Figures (1-1)

506

Tables (1-4)

207

Sum=4328

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

913

Download

1553

Sum=2466

Mar 24, 2016 (publication date) through Nov 7, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Urology

ISSN

2219-2816

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 60-65
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60

Table 4 Renal function

	RP (n = 54)	TP (n = 37)	P
Preoperative creatinine, mean (SD)	0.95 (0.21)	0.90 (0.17)	0.27¹
	n = 53	n = 36
Postop creatinine, mean (SD)	1.0 (0.21)	1.0 (0.18)	0.67¹
	n = 46	n = 28

P = Significance based on:

¹Independent samples t-test. RP: Retroperitoneal; TP: Transperitoneal; SD: Standard deviation.

Citation: Wetterlin JJ, Blackwell RH, Capodice S, Kliethermes S, Quek ML, Gupta GN. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 60-65
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/60.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60