Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 60-65
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
RP (n = 54) | TP (n = 37) | P | |
Total operative time (SD) | 180.7 (62.3) | 227.8 (59.0) | < 0.0011 |
Robot console time, mean (SD) | 126.9 (40.0) | 164.3 (51.3) | < 0.0011 |
WIT, median (IQR)4 | 28.0 (20-31) | 27.0 (21-31) | 0.963 |
n = 23 | n = 28 | ||
Conversion | |||
No | 52 (96.3%) | 32 (86.5%) | 0.122 |
Yes | 2 (3.7%) | 5 (13.5%) | |
EBL, median (IQR) | 32.5 (20-100) | 150.0 (50-250) | < 0.0013 |
- Citation: Wetterlin JJ, Blackwell RH, Capodice S, Kliethermes S, Quek ML, Gupta GN. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 60-65
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/60.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60