Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 45-52
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.45
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.45
Received adjuvant therapy | Adjuvant candidate and received salvage radiotherapy | P value | ||
Age at RT (median, IQR), mo | 60 (54-65) | 63 (59-68) | 0.2 | |
Follow-up (mo) | 53 (19-83) | 50 (22-854) | 0.1 | |
Time from RP to RT, mo | 0-12 | 43 (93%) | 12 (14%) | < 0.001 |
> 12-24 | 3 (7%) | 18 (21%) | ||
> 24-48 | 0 (0%) | 29 (33%) | ||
> 48 | 0 (0%) | 28 (32%) | ||
Pre-RT PSA | Undetectable | 46 (100%) | 0 (0%) | < 0.001 |
> 0-0.2 | 0 (0%) | 39 (46%) | ||
> 0.2-1.0 | 0 (0%) | 38 (45%) | ||
> 1.0 | 0 (0%) | 7 (8%) | ||
Received | No | 37 (79%) | 67 (77%) | 0.8 |
Peri-RT ADT | Yes | 10 (21%) | 20 (23%) | |
Coronary artery disease | No | 36 (86%) | 64 (84%) | 0.8 |
Yes | 6 (14%) | 12 (16%) | ||
Diabetes mellitus, type II | No | 37 (88%) | 58 (76%) | 0.1 |
Yes | 5 (12%) | 18 (24%) | ||
Hypertension | No | 19 (45%) | 37 (49%) | 0.6 |
Yes | 23 (55%) | 39 (51%) | ||
Obesity | No | 31 (74%) | 51 (67%) | 0.4 |
Yes | 11 (26%) | 25 (33%) | ||
Peripheral vascular disease | No | 39 (93%) | 73 (96%) | 0.4 |
Yes | 3 (7%) | 3 (4%) | ||
Smoking history | No | 37 (88%) | 70 (92%) | 0.5 |
Yes | 5 (12%) | 6 (8%) | ||
Pathologic | 2-6 | 9 (20%) | 18 (21%) | 0.4 |
Gleason score | 7 | 21 (48%) | 48 (57%) | |
8-10 | 14 (32%) | 18 (21%) | ||
Pathologic | T1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.08 |
Tumor stage | T2 | 11 (25%) | 35 (41%) | |
T3/T4 | 33 (75%) | 51 (59%) | ||
Positive surgical margin | Absent | 12 (25%) | 28 (32%) | 0.4 |
Present | 35 (75%) | 59 (68%) | ||
Extracapsular extension | Absent | 20 (43%) | 41 (47%) | 0.6 |
Present | 27 (57%) | 46 (53%) | ||
Seminal vesicle invasion | Absent | 37 (79%) | 80 (92%) | 0.03 |
Present | 10 (21%) | 7 (8%) |
- Citation: Blackwell RH, Gange W, Kandabarow AM, Harkenrider MM, Gupta GN, Quek ML, Flanigan RC. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer improves biochemical recurrence free survival compared to salvage radiotherapy. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 45-52
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/45.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.45