Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 29-36
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29
Table 2 Comparison of the reference isovolumetric pressure with estimates given by detrusor coefficient/bladder contractility index and projected isovolumetric pressure 11
| Reference isovolumetric pressure (cm H2O) | DECO/BCI (pdetQmax + 5 Qmax) | PIP1 (pdetQmax + Qmax) | |
| Mean ± SD (mean) | 50 ± 25 (45) | 133 ± 45 (128) | 49 ± 17 (48) |
| 5 and 95 percentiles | 20/112 | 60/215 | 29/78 |
| Mean difference (cm H2O) from reference (95%CI: Wilcoxon signed ranks test) | - | 86 (76-96; P < 0.05) | 0.2 (-5 to 5; P = 0.98) |
| Spearman’s coefficient of correlation with reference | - | 0.21 (P = 0.06) | 0.52 (P < 0.01) |
- Citation: Valdevenito JP, Walton-Diaz A. Diagnosis of voiding dysfunction by pressure-flow study in women. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 29-36
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/29.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29