Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 29-36
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29
Rud et al[13] | Rud et al[14] | Karram et al[15] | Pauwels et al[16] | |
No. of patients | 16 | 6 | 30 | 26 |
Patients condition | Healthy | Healthy | Asymptomatic, continent | Healthy, history free, continent |
Age, yr (range) | 33 (23-73) | 42 (37–54) | 34 | 26 |
Definitions | ||||
Detrusor contraction | Not defined | Not defined | Increase in detrusor pressure of 5 cm H2O above resting pressure | Increase in detrusor pressure of 15 cm H2O above resting pressure1 |
Strain to void | Not defined | Not defined | Increase in abdominal pressure of at least 10 cm H2O above baseline | Increase in abdominal pressure of at least 10 cm H2O above baseline during the entire voiding phase |
Voiding pattern | ||||
Drop in urethral pressure | 16/16 (100%) | 6/6 (100%) | Not studied | Not studied |
Detrusor contraction | 16/16 (100%) | 6/6 (100%) | 30/30 (100%) | 26/26 (100%) |
Strain to void | 0/16 (0%) | 0/6 (0%) | 22/30 (73%) | 11/26 (42%) |
- Citation: Valdevenito JP, Walton-Diaz A. Diagnosis of voiding dysfunction by pressure-flow study in women. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 29-36
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/29.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.29