Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2015; 4(1): 27-37
Published online Mar 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.27
Table 3 Factors associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy
Age of patients: Younger (specially adolescent) and older patients (> 55 yr)
Gender: Male (or female), not having a female partner
Socioeconomics and cultural: Poor health coverage, poor health access, costs of treatment, difficulty in transportation, poor social support, unmarried, no family, non caucasian, inmigrant, lack of general education and specific education about renal transplantation, lower income, lower socioeconomic class, poor socioeconomic background, greater parental distress and lower family cohesion in family functioning
Medication: Complex medical regimens, higher number of drugs, longer post-transplant, toxicity and side effects, poor tolerance of medication, higher number of doctors, poor provider-patient rapport, patient implicitly seen as defaulter
Psychological: Psychological (dependency, high levels of anxiety and hostility; in children, poorer behavioral functioning and greater distress) and psychiatric illness (depression), low self-efficacy with med intake, perceptions of immunosuppressive therapy as not needed to keep the kidney, significant positive relationship between pre-tx non-adherence and post-tx non-adherence (past behaviour predicts future behaviour), evolution of disease is a matter of chance, forgetfulness, rebelliousness, poor perception of health, poor satisfaction, low health-related quality of life, addictions, lack of coping strategies and avoidance behavior
Patient morbidity: Comorbidity, receiving a transplant from a live donor, retransplant, non-insulin-dependent diabetes
Other: No research, opportunities for improving adherence through optimizing the health care system or training the health care work remain hidden