Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Nov 24, 2014; 3(3): 258-263
Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.258
Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.258
Initial ESA hyporesponsiveness |
Classify patients as having ESA hyporesponsiveness if they have no increase in Hb concentration from baseline after the first month of ESA treatment on appropriate weight-based dosing |
In patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness, avoid repeated escalations of the ESA dose beyond double the initial weight-based dose |
Subsequent ESA hyporesponsiveness |
Classify patients as having acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness if after treatment with stable doses of ESA, they require two increases in ESA doses up to 50% beyond the dose at which they had been stable in an effort to maintain a stable Hb concentration |
In patients with acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness, avoid repeated escalations in ESA dose beyond double the dose at which they had been stable |
Management of poor ESA responsiveness |
Evaluate patients with either initial or acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness and treat for specific causes of poor ESA response |
For patients who remain hyporesponsive despite the correction of treatable causes, accounting for relative risks and benefits: decline in Hb concentration; continuing ESA if needed to maintain Hb concentration, with due consideration of the doses required; blood transfusions |
- Citation: Katagiri D, Hinoshita F. Benefits and risks of erythrocyte-stimulating agents. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(3): 258-263
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v3/i3/258.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.258