Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Nov 24, 2014; 3(3): 209-217
Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.209
Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.209
Evidence summary | LE |
Periurethral injection of bulking agent may provide short-term improvement in symptoms (3 mo), but not cure, in women with SUI | 2a |
Repeat injections to achieve therapeutic effect are often required | 2a |
Bulking agents are less effective than colposuspension or autologous sling for cure of SUI | 2a |
Adverse effect rates are lower compared to open surgery | 2a |
There is no evidence that one type of bulking agent is better than another type | 1b |
Transperineal route of injection may be associated with a higher risk of urinary retention compared to the transurethral route | 2b |
Recommendations | GR |
Do not offer bulking agents to women who are seeking a permanent cure for stress urinary incontinence | A |
- Citation: Bayrak O, Mock S, Dmochowski RR. Injectable treatments for female stress urinary incontinence. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(3): 209-217
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v3/i3/209.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.209