Original Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2014; 3(1): 47-53
Published online Mar 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i1.47
Table 4 Published nomograms to predict positive prostate biopsy in repeat biopsy
Ref.No. of patientsAUCAUC of external validationNo of factorsNomogram factorsMean of no of biopsy coresCa detection rate, %
Lopez-Corona et al[9,12]3430.7000.7108Standard factors + PSAV, HGPIN, ASAP, No. of total cores, biopsy history, family history9.1520
2Walz et al[10]1610.720-9Age, PSA, %free PSA, PSA density, TZ density, prostate volume, TZ volume, no of previous biopsy, no of cores.2441
Chun et al[11]10820.7600.68-0.786Standard factors, prostate volume, biopsy history, %free PSA, sampling density11.130.2
Benecchi et al[13]419-0.8567DRE + PSA slope, HGPIN, %free PSA, PSA density-31
Rochester et al[14]1100.8180.6967Standard factors + PSA velocity, HGPIN, biopsy history, %free PSA-30-31
Chun et al[15,16]8090.7000.73-0.7516Standard factors + prostate volume, biopsy history, PCA31539.1
Moussa et al[17]4080.7200.62012Standard factors + prostate volume, PSA velocity, HGPIN, ASAP, No. of total cores, family history, time from initial/previous biopsy, BMI19.131.6
2Sakura et al[18]5150.791-5Age, %free PSA, prostate volume, previous extended biopsy, PSA doubling time2631.6
Present series4590.740-16Age, No. of biopsy core, PSA, PSA density, prostate volume, TZ volume, PSA TZ density, TRUS, DRE, HGPIN, ASAP, months from initial biopsy and previous biopsy, No. of previous negative biopsy, PSA slope11.417