How to improve a urology outpatient service? A survey of patient satisfaction

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 2, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

458

HTML

6357

Figures (1-2)

387

Tables (1-4)

242

Sum=7444

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1049

Download

811

Sum=1860

Nov 24, 2013 (publication date) through Nov 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Urology

ISSN

2219-2816

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Clin Urol. Nov 24, 2013; 2(3): 46-52
Published online Nov 24, 2013. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v2.i3.46

Table 1 Analysis of consultant vs registrar led consultation duration time, delay of consultation, and patient satisfaction

Citation: Lukacs S, Tschobotko B, Mukerji G, Vale J, Mazaris E. How to improve a urology outpatient service? A survey of patient satisfaction. World J Clin Urol 2013; 2(3): 46-52
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v2/i3/46.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v2.i3.46