Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Urol. Jul 24, 2013; 2(2): 3-9
Published online Jul 24, 2013. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v2.i2.3
Published online Jul 24, 2013. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v2.i2.3
Table 2 Clinical characteristics between patients undergoing transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
| Variables | tRARP (n = 50) | eRARP (n = 70) |
| Age (yr) | 60.5 ± 7.5 (42-72) | 62.1 ± 6 (47-72) |
| PSA (ng/mL) | 8.67 ± 6.1 (2.8-34.8) | 8.66 ± 8.58 (1.3-71.8) |
| Prostate volume (cc) | 39.5 ± 14.66 (15-70) | 44.9 ± 17.4 (18-82) |
| Biopsy Gleason score | ||
| 6 | 26 | 30 |
| 7 | 20 | 38 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 |
| Pathological stage | ||
| T2 | 37 | 51 |
| T3a | 11 | 12 |
| T3b | 2 | 7 |
| Specimen Gleason score | ||
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | 10 |
| 7 | 30 | 52 |
| 8 | 4 | 3 |
| 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Cancer volume (cc) | 3.9 ± 3.2 (0.06-14.7) | 3.2 ± 3.58 (0.2-23.7) |
| Positive surgical margin | ||
| T2 | 13.5% of 37 patients | 12.7% of 48 patients |
| T3 | 30.5% of 13 patients | 22.7% of 22 patients |
- Citation: Anderson C, Ayres B, Issa R, Perry M, Liatsikos E, Stolzenburg JU, Ghani KR. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison with transperitoneal technique. World J Clin Urol 2013; 2(2): 3-9
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v2/i2/3.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v2.i2.3