Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Pediatr. Feb 8, 2017; 6(1): 69-80
Published online Feb 8, 2017. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.69
Published online Feb 8, 2017. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.69
Potential problems/negative impact | |
Communication | |
Not-verbalizing the reasons for initiating an intervention. e.g., intubation, chest compression, etc. | Lack of understanding the reasons behind an intervention, limits team members' ability to provide suggestions |
Chest compression and PPV rhythm not verbalized “one and two and three and breathe” | Lack of synchronization delays neonate’s response to resuscitation |
Heart rate is not verbalized after auscultating | Delay in making a decision on initiation/non initiation of chest compression |
Excessive reliance on non-verbal communication, e.g., asking for a suction catheter by “stretching hands” after inserting the laryngoscope orally, as opposed to a “verbal request” | Delay in receiving suction catheter causes frustration in the intubator and delays the resuscitation efforts |
Silencing alarms and not communicating the alarm to the team leader | Lack of awareness impedes accurate decision making and timely initiation of interventions |
Team members not communicating assertively, e.g., Considering a higher peak inspiratory pressure in a non-responding infant | Delay in trouble shooting leading to ineffective resuscitation |
Not sharing of relevant obstetric information with NR team during resuscitation of a depressed infant, e.g., MSL, abruption, Morphine | Delay in considering appropriate interventions, e.g., ET suction, fluid bolus and Naloxone respectively |
Leadership | |
Leader was totally passive | Leads to momentary assumption of role by another member. Often results in delayed decision making, team losing focus, excessive indulgence in unnecessary interventions, e.g., suctioning, and lack of assessment of response to interventions |
Fixation error, e.g., Making decisions of intubation and chest compression in a nonresponsive infant without ensuring good seal during mask ventilation | Unnecessary invasive interventions with a potential for adverse events |
Lack of evaluation of plans during resuscitation | Prevents team members ability to provide suggestions |
Team members positioning/configuration | |
Hands free team leader standing at the head end and RRTs who are on one side of the infant | Leader impedes effective delivery of mask ventilation |
Initiating chest compression with the side walls up | Impedes effective performance of chest compression |
Technical | |
Ineffective seal around the mask during mask ventilation | Delay in responding to resuscitation |
Attempting nasal intubation while resuscitating an unresponsive infant with severe bradycardia | Potential delay in intubation |
Not venting stomach after a prolonged mask PPV | Secondary deterioration in SpO2 and heart rate |
Not vigilant about FiO2 during resuscitation. Started 100% FiO2 only after 90 s of chest compression | Delay in response to resuscitation |
Extubation while securing the ET tube as ET tube is not held firmly against the hard palate during taping | Potential for secondary deterioration or delay in resuscitation |
- Citation: Shivananda S, Twiss J, el-Gouhary E, el-Helou S, Williams C, Murthy P, Suresh G. Video recording of neonatal resuscitation: A feasibility study to inform widespread adoption. World J Clin Pediatr 2017; 6(1): 69-80
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v6/i1/69.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.69