Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Pediatr. Feb 8, 2017; 6(1): 69-80
Published online Feb 8, 2017. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.69
Table 4 Policy, caregiver roles and latent safety threat issues noted during: Issues noted during video reviewing
Potential problems/negative impact
Communication
Not-verbalizing the reasons for initiating an intervention. e.g., intubation, chest compression, etc.Lack of understanding the reasons behind an intervention, limits team members' ability to provide suggestions
Chest compression and PPV rhythm not verbalized “one and two and three and breathe”Lack of synchronization delays neonate’s response to resuscitation
Heart rate is not verbalized after auscultatingDelay in making a decision on initiation/non initiation of chest compression
Excessive reliance on non-verbal communication, e.g., asking for a suction catheter by “stretching hands” after inserting the laryngoscope orally, as opposed to a “verbal request”Delay in receiving suction catheter causes frustration in the intubator and delays the resuscitation efforts
Silencing alarms and not communicating the alarm to the team leaderLack of awareness impedes accurate decision making and timely initiation of interventions
Team members not communicating assertively, e.g., Considering a higher peak inspiratory pressure in a non-responding infantDelay in trouble shooting leading to ineffective resuscitation
Not sharing of relevant obstetric information with NR team during resuscitation of a depressed infant, e.g., MSL, abruption, MorphineDelay in considering appropriate interventions, e.g., ET suction, fluid bolus and Naloxone respectively
Leadership
Leader was totally passiveLeads to momentary assumption of role by another member. Often results in delayed decision making, team losing focus, excessive indulgence in unnecessary interventions, e.g., suctioning, and lack of assessment of response to interventions
Fixation error, e.g., Making decisions of intubation and chest compression in a nonresponsive infant without ensuring good seal during mask ventilationUnnecessary invasive interventions with a potential for adverse events
Lack of evaluation of plans during resuscitationPrevents team members ability to provide suggestions
Team members positioning/configuration
Hands free team leader standing at the head end and RRTs who are on one side of the infantLeader impedes effective delivery of mask ventilation
Initiating chest compression with the side walls upImpedes effective performance of chest compression
Technical
Ineffective seal around the mask during mask ventilationDelay in responding to resuscitation
Attempting nasal intubation while resuscitating an unresponsive infant with severe bradycardiaPotential delay in intubation
Not venting stomach after a prolonged mask PPVSecondary deterioration in SpO2 and heart rate
Not vigilant about FiO2 during resuscitation. Started 100% FiO2 only after 90 s of chest compressionDelay in response to resuscitation
Extubation while securing the ET tube as ET tube is not held firmly against the hard palate during tapingPotential for secondary deterioration or delay in resuscitation