Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Pediatr. May 8, 2016; 5(2): 159-171
Published online May 8, 2016. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.159
Published online May 8, 2016. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.159
Antiseptic agent | Mechanism of action | Advantages | Disadvantages | Preparations/compounds |
Chlorhexidine | Disruption of cytoplasmic membranes | Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity | Non-sporicidal | 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 4% - aqueous and alcohol based |
Denaturation of proteins | Kills yeasts | Not effective against mycobacteria | ||
Intermediate onset of action | Local dermatitis | |||
Activity not affected by organic material | Neurotoxicity | |||
Residual activity | Non-sporicidal | |||
Alcohols | Damages cell membrane | Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity | Not active in presence of organic material | Ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, methanol |
Denaturation of proteins | Faster onset of action | No residual activity | ||
Skin reactions | ||||
Systemic absorption | ||||
Iodine | Forms complexes with proteins and lipids | Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity | Skin irritation | 10% povidone-iodine |
Impaired protein synthesis and alteration of cell membranes | Sporicidal | Systemic absorption with hypothyroidism | ||
Effective against mycobacteria | ||||
Has some residual activity | ||||
Hexachlorophene | Inactivates essential enzyme systems | Good activity against gram positive, weak against gram negative | Residual activity | Currently not recommended for bathing neonates |
Neurotoxicity |
- Citation: Sathiyamurthy S, Banerjee J, Godambe SV. Antiseptic use in the neonatal intensive care unit - a dilemma in clinical practice: An evidence based review. World J Clin Pediatr 2016; 5(2): 159-171
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v5/i2/159.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.159