Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2025; 14(2): 101873
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i2.101873
Table 4 Therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), n (%)
Therapy
Results (n = 225)
Nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs225 (100)
Glucocorticosteroids
Not received180 (80.0)
Intravenous11 (4.8)
Oral5 (2.2)
Intra-articular22 (9.7)
Sulfasalazine8 (3.6)
Methotrexate205 (91.5)
Early methotrexate withdrawal29/205 (14.1)
Leflunomide1 (0.4)
Cyclosporine A5 (2.2)
Patients, treated with biologics91 (40.4)
The first-line biological drugs
Etanercept60/91 (65.9)
Adalimumab21/91 (23.1)
Tocilizumab7/91 (7.7)
Secukinumab2/91 (2.2)
Abatacept1/91 (1.1)
Time to the first biologic, medians (25%, 75%) (months)6 (3, 18)
Remission on the first biologic34/86 (39.5)
Time to remission on the first biologic, medians (25%, 75%) (months)8.5 (6, 24)
De-novo uveitis on etanercept4/60 (6.7)
Patients, treated with second-line biologic12/91 (13.8)
The second-line biological drugs
Etanercept1 (8.3)
Adalimumab5 (41.7)
Tocilizumab1 (8.3)
Secukinumab2 (16.7)
Abatacept1 (8.3)
Upadacitinib2 (16.7)
Time to the second biologic, medians (25%, 75%) (months)24 (2, 38)
Patients with remission on the second biologic5/11 (45.5)
Time to remission on the second biologic, medians (25%, 75%) (months)6 (6, 6)