Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Pediatr. Dec 9, 2023; 12(5): 295-309
Published online Dec 9, 2023. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.295
Table 5 Comparison of different imaging modalities in nephrocalcinosis due to RTA
ModalityAdvantagesLimitations
X-rayReadily available; Cost-effective; Quick initial assessment; Suitable for detecting large, dense stonesLimited sensitivity for smaller or radiolucent stones; No detailed anatomical information
UltrasoundCan be used to assess kidney size, shape, and echogenicity; Non-invasive; Real-time imaging; Widely available; Initial assessment of kidney stones and medullary cystReduced sensitivity for smaller or deeply located calcifications; Limited anatomical details
CTExcellent spatial resolution; Detailed cross-sectional images; Highly sensitive for detecting kidney stones and calcifications; Assesses impact on kidney function and urinary tractInvolves exposure to ionizing radiation; Contrast agents may be contraindicated in some patients; Not suitable for all patients due to contrast use
MRINo ionizing radiation; Detailed images of the extent of calcification and surrounding soft tissue damage; Multiplanar imaging capability; Can provide information on tissue characteristics and perfusionIt may not be as readily available as other modalities; Limited sensitivity for detecting small or faint calcifications