Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Respirol. Jan 17, 2019; 9(1): 1-7
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Sin, 2000[12] | 2.2 yr (median) | 66 | No-CSA-control vs no-CSA-CPAP vs CSA-CPAP vs CSA-control | Mortality-cardiac transplantation rate↓ who complied with CPAP, LVEF↑ in CSA-CPAP group |
Bradley, 2005[13] (CANPAP trial) | 2 yr (mean) | 258 | CSA-control vs CPAP | Plasma NE↓, LVEF↑, distance in a 6-min walk test↑ |
Arzt, 2007[14] (Post hoc analysis of CANPAP trial) | 23 mo (mean) | 210 | CSA-control vs CPAP | Patients whose AHI < 15 events/h by CPAP had significantly improved transplant-free survival and greater improvement in LVEF compared with control |
- Citation: Murata A, Kasai T. Treatment of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure: Now and future. World J Respirol 2019; 9(1): 1-7
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6255/full/v9/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1