Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Respirol. Jan 17, 2019; 9(1): 1-7
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Pepperell, 2003[31] | 1 mo | 30 | Therapeutic mv-ASV vs subtherapeutic mv-ASV | Plasma BNP↓, urinary metadrenaline↓ |
Philippe, 2006[11] | 6 mo | 25 | CPAP vs mv-ASV | Significant increase in LVEF and improvement in QOL in ASV group |
Fietze, 2008[32] | 1.5 mo | 37 | bi-level PAP with standard S/T mode vs mv-ASV mode | LVEF increased more in the bi-level PAP group. Daytime blood pressure and heart rate did not change |
Kasai, 2013[10] | 3 mo | 23 | CPAP vs pf-ASV | LVEF increased more in the ASV group |
O’Connor, 2017[21] (CAT-HF trial)1 | 6 mo | 126 | SDB-control vs mv-ASV | No significant cardiac improvement found |
- Citation: Murata A, Kasai T. Treatment of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure: Now and future. World J Respirol 2019; 9(1): 1-7
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6255/full/v9/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1