Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Respirol. Jul 28, 2015; 5(2): 112-125
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v5.i2.112
Table 4 Summary of recommendations for the use of adaptive-servo ventilation in various settings
SettingsIndicationImprovement other than AHISupporting evidence
With SDB
HFAfter optimization of HF, with CSA not suppressed by CPAPDaytime sleepinessRCTs (vs CPAP)[3,4,40,41,43]
LVEFRCTs (vs control)[36,42]
BNPRCT (vs Bi-level PAP)[37]
Event-free survival
Treatment-emergent CSAWith HFSame as HF
Without HFSleep architectureRetrospective studies (pre-post study, vs CPAP)[64,65]
Adherence of PAP
Idiopathic CSAWith symptomsDaytime alertness and moodCase series (pre-post study, vs CPAP or oxygen)[5]
Opioid-induced CSABenefit unknown
Stroke-related CSAPost-acute phaseDaytime sleepinessA single-center retrospective study (pre-post study)[86]
Without SDB
HFRegardless of the presence or absence of SDBLVEFA multi-center retrospective study (pre-post study)[91]
NYHA class
Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edemaWith elevated filling pressureDyspneaAn observational study (vs supplemental oxygen alone)[12]
High blood pressure
Atrial fibrillationDuring PVIProcedural timeOn-off study[93]