Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Ophthalmol. May 12, 2015; 5(2): 55-72
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5318/wjo.v5.i2.55
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5318/wjo.v5.i2.55
Ref. | Purpose | Study design | Out comes measures | IVP dose | Interval of injection | Naive or refractory /DME | Duration of study | Number of eyes | Treatment regimen | Results |
Cunningham et al[81] | IVP for DME | RCT | BCVA and CMT | 0.3, 1 and 3 mg | 1 mo | Naive | 36 wk | 172 | Group 1 (IVP0.3, n = 44 eyes) 0.3 mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) [median 5 injections (range 1-6)] Group 2 (IVP1, n = 44 eyes) mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) [median 6 injections (range 3–6))] Group 3 (IVP3, n = 42 eyes) 3 mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) (median 6 injections (range 1-6) Group 4 (C, n = 42 eyes): sham injection | BCVA changes (letters) P value IVP0.3 +4.7 0.04 IVP1 +4.7 0.05 IVP3 +1.1 NS C -0.4 CMT changes (μm,) IVP0.3 -68.0 0.02 IVP1 -22.7 NS IVP3 -5.3 NS C +3.7 |
Sultan et al[83] | IVP for DME | RCT | BCVA and CMT | 0.3 mg | 6 wk | Naive | 2 yr | 260 | Group 1 (IVP, n = 133 eyes): 0.3 mg IV pegaptanib Group 2 (C, n = 127 eyes) sham injection | BCVA changes (letters) P value IVP +5.2 < 0.05 C +1.2 CMT (OCT): Decrease in CMT IVP ≥ 25%: 31.7% NS ≥ 50%: 14.6% NS C ≥ 25%: 23.7% ≥ 50%: 11.9% |
- Citation: Nourinia R, Soheilian M. State of the art management of diabetic macular edema. World J Ophthalmol 2015; 5(2): 55-72
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6239/full/v5/i2/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5318/wjo.v5.i2.55