Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Ophthalmol. May 12, 2015; 5(2): 55-72
Published online May 12, 2015. doi: 10.5318/wjo.v5.i2.55
Table 3 Summary of the studies using intravitreal Pegaptanib for treatment of diabetic macular edema
Ref.PurposeStudy designOut comes measuresIVP doseInterval of injectionNaive or refractory /DMEDuration of studyNumber of eyesTreatment regimenResults
Cunningham et al[81]IVP for DMERCTBCVA and CMT0.3, 1 and 3 mg1 moNaive36 wk172Group 1 (IVP0.3, n = 44 eyes) 0.3 mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) [median 5 injections (range 1-6)] Group 2 (IVP1, n = 44 eyes) mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) [median 6 injections (range 3–6))] Group 3 (IVP3, n = 42 eyes) 3 mg IV pegaptanib (90 μL) (median 6 injections (range 1-6) Group 4 (C, n = 42 eyes): sham injectionBCVA changes (letters) P value IVP0.3 +4.7 0.04 IVP1 +4.7 0.05 IVP3 +1.1 NS C -0.4 CMT changes (μm,) IVP0.3 -68.0 0.02 IVP1 -22.7 NS IVP3 -5.3 NS C +3.7
Sultan et al[83]IVP for DMERCTBCVA and CMT0.3 mg6 wkNaive2 yr260Group 1 (IVP, n = 133 eyes): 0.3 mg IV pegaptanib Group 2 (C, n = 127 eyes) sham injectionBCVA changes (letters) P value IVP +5.2 < 0.05 C +1.2 CMT (OCT): Decrease in CMT IVP ≥ 25%: 31.7% NS ≥ 50%: 14.6% NS C ≥ 25%: 23.7% ≥ 50%: 11.9%