Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2014; 3(4): 162-170
Published online Nov 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.162
Table 1 Epithelial ovarian cancer
Ref.Study designHRT vs controlStageType of HRTMonths HRTMonths follow upRecurrence HRT vs controlsStudy conclusions
Eeles et al[37]Retrospective case-control78/2951-2: 55% 3-4: 45%Oral EstrogenMedian 28Median 42-No effects of HRT on prognosis
Estrogen + Progestogen
Estrogen + Tibolone
Guidozzi et al[12]Randomized controlled trial59/661-2: 27% 3-4: 73%Conjugate Estrogen28Mean 4232 vs 41No effect of HRT on DFS and OFS
Bebar et al[36]Retrospective cohort study31/0NSNon-conjugated-Estrogen + ProgestogenMean 25Mean 553No effect of HRT on progression of EOC
Ursic-Vrscaj et al[38]Retrospective case-control24/481-2: 54% 3-4: 46%Non-conjugated-EstrogenMean 24Mean 495 vs 15No effect of HRT on survival
Estrogen + Progestogen
Estrogen + Tibolone
Mascarenhas et al[33]Prospective cohort study649 EOC1-2: 60% 3-4: 40%EstrogenUp to 2460-Better survival in HRT users vs non users
150 BOTEstrogen + Progestogen
Li et al[39]Prospective cohort study31/451-2: 28% 3-4: 72%Conjugated-Estrogen + ProgestogenMean 28.7Mean 31.4-No effect of HRT on cumulative survival HRT improve quality of life