Prevention of shoulder dystocia related birth injuries: Myths and facts

doi:10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.148

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (12090)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

583

WORD

421

HTML

7078

Figures (1-1)

254

Tables (1-6)

216

Sum=8552

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

524

Download

1231

Sum=1755

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

955

Download

828

Sum=1783

Nov 10, 2014 (publication date) through Nov 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

ISSN

2218-6220

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2014; 3(4): 148-161
Published online Nov 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.148

Table 4 Risks of shoulder dystocia related fetal damage in spontaneous and instrument assisted deliveries

Birth weights	Spontaneous deliveries	Instrumental extractions
Under 3500 g	1:5660	1:900
3500-3999 g	1:1740	1:110
4000-4499 g	1:204	1:24
4500-4999 g	1:41	1:6
≥ 5000 g	1:25	1:3

Birth weight related fetal risks for damage in cases of spontaneous vs instrument assisted deliveries. Note that use of extraction instruments increases the chance for fetal damage almost 10-fold.

Citation: Iffy L. Prevention of shoulder dystocia related birth injuries: Myths and facts. World J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 3(4): 148-161
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v3/i4/148.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.148