Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2014; 3(4): 141-147
Published online Nov 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.141
Table 3 Studies reporting preeclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension in relation to length of sexual cohabitation and use of barrier contraception
Ref.DesignSample sizeMain outcome measuresResults
Robillard et al[7]Retrospective cohort1011 pregnanciesIncidence of PIHIncidence of PIH was 10.6% (entire cohort) and 5.1% among women with > 12 mo of sexual cohabitation (11.9% and 3.3% for primigravidae, respectively)
Verwoerd et al[28]Case control60 cases with preeclampsia 60 normotensive controlsLength of sexual cohabitationUnprotected sexual cohabitation of > 6 mo was a negative predictor for preeclampsia (coefficient -0.57, SE 0.62, P = 0.03)
Olayemi et al[31]Prospective cohort2630 pregnanciesIncidence of hypertension in pregnancyLength of sexual cohabitation before pregnancy was protective against hypertension in pregnancy (HR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93-0.99) but not preeclampsia (HR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.00-1.15)
Kho et al[42]Prospective cohort2507 pregnanciesIncidence of preeclampsiaOR for preeclampsia were 2.32 (95%CI: 1.03-5.25) and 1.88 (95%CI: 1.05-3.36) for short sexual relationship of less then 3 mo and less then 6 mo respectively
Klonoff-Cohen et al[43] 1989Case control110 preeclamptic cases 115 normotensive controlsContraceptive and reproductive history of subjectsOR for preeclampsia for barrier contraceptive users was 2.37 (95%CI: 1.01-5.58)
Mills et al[44]Merge data from two prospective cohort studies13914 pregnancies (total)Incidence of preeclampsiaOR for preeclampsia in barrier contraceptive users were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-1.12) (one study) and 0.85 (95%CI: 0.49-1.45) (second study)
Saftlas et al[46]Case control258 cases 182 controlsLength of sexual cohabitationOR for preeclampsia among women with long (> 90%) sexual relation-OR = 0.3 (95%CI: 0.1-0.9)