Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2014; 3(4): 141-147
Published online Nov 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.141
Published online Nov 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.141
Ref. | Design | Sample size | Main outcome measures | Findings |
Donor oocytes | ||||
Söderström-Anttila et al[11] | Retrospective cohort | 51 oocyte donation pregnancies 97 IVF age matched controls | The incidence of PIH and preeclampsia | The incidence of PIH in primiparae was 30% in oocyte donor recipients and 13% in IVF controls (P < 0.05), no difference in preeclampsia incidence between two groups |
Salha et al[10] | Retrospective cohort | 27 donor oocytes pregnancies 27 age-and parity matched controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | Preeclampsia incidence 16% vs 3.7% (cases vs controls), P < 0.05 |
Keegan et al[38] | Retrospective anonymous questionnaire study | 199 oocyte donor recipients 488 autologous IVF controls | The incidence of PIH | Rate of pregnancy induced hypertension in < 35 years old was 42% vs 12%, P < 0.001 (cases vs controls) and > 40 years old 26% vs 14%, P = 0.003 (cases vs controls) |
Klatsky et al[9] | Retrospective matched cohort | 77 donor oocytes recipients 81 autologous IVF controls | The incidence of PIH and preeclampsia | 16.9% of cases with preeclampsia vs 4.9% controls 24.7% of cases with PIH vs 7.4 % controls Adjusted OR for preeclampsia with donor oocytes OR = 4.0 (95%CI: 1.2-13.8) and for gestational hypertension OR = 4.2 (95%CI: 1.5-11.9) |
Tranquilli et al[12] | Retrospective matched cohort | 26 donor oocytes recipients 52 autologous ICSI pregnancies 52 AMA controls | Prevalence of preeclampsia | Prevalence of preeclampsia 19.2% in donor oocyte recipients vs 0% in autologous ICSI and AMA controls (P < 0.001) |
Donor sperm | ||||
Need et al[33] | Case series | 584 AID pregnancies | The incidence of preeclampsia | Preeclampsia incidence 9.3% |
Smith et al[35] | Retrospective cohort | 37 donor insemination pregnancies 44 controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | 24.3% of cases with preeclampsia vs 6.8% controls RR for preeclampsia with donor insemination RR = 1.85 (95%CI: 1.20-2.85) |
Hoy et al[34] | Retrospective cohort | 1552 donor insemination pregnancies 7717 controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | 8.4% of cases with preeclampsia vs 5.2 % controls Adjusted OR for preeclampsia with donor insemination OR = 1.4 (95%CI: 1.2-1.8) |
Salha et al[10] | Retrospective cohort | 33 donor sperm pregnancies 33 age-and parity matched controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | Preeclampsia incidence 18.2% vs 0% (cases vs controls), P < 0.05 |
Hall et al[37] | Retrospective cohort | 45 donor insemination pregnancies 173 controls | The incidence of proteinuric hypertension | No difference in incidence of proteinuric hypertension between cases and controls (13.3% vs 11.0%) |
Kyrou et al[36] | Retrospective cohort | 438 donor insemination pregnancies 275 partner sperm | The incidence of preeclampsia | Preeclampsia incidence 10.9% vs 7.2% (cases vs controls), difference 3.7%; 95%CI: -0.8 to 7.8 |
Donor embryos | ||||
Porreco et al[39] | Retrospective cohort | 23 donor embryos pregnancies 24 age matched IVF controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | 26% of cases with preeclampsia vs 29% controls OR for preeclampsia with donor embryos OR = 0.86 (95%CI: 0.24-3.09) |
Salha et al[10] | Retrospective cohort | 12 donor embryos pregnancies 12 age-and parity matched controls | The incidence of preeclampsia | Preeclampsia incidence 25% vs 0% (cases vs controls), NS |
- Citation: Breborowicz A, Klatsky P. Association between gamete source, exposure and preeclampsia: A review of literature. World J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 3(4): 141-147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v3/i4/141.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i4.141