Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Obstet Gynecol. May 10, 2014; 3(2): 85-89
Published online May 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.85
Published online May 10, 2014. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.85
Table 1 Comparison of the difference between pretest, posttest and follow up assessments
| Paired differences | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | |||||
| Mean | SD | SEM | 95%CI of the difference | |||||
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Pretest-immediate posttest | -5.864 | 4.357 | 0.929 | -7.795 | -3.932 | -6.313 | 21 | 0.000 |
| Pretest-one month follow up | -4.636 | 5.482 | 1.169 | -7.067 | -2.206 | -3.967 | 21 | 0.001 |
| Pretest-post 3 mo | -4.409 | 5.152 | 1.098 | -6.693 | -2.125 | -4.014 | 21 | 0.001 |
| Pretest-post 6 mo | -5.636 | 4.756 | 1.014 | -7.745 | -3.527 | -5.558 | 21 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Doehrman P, Erickson L, Galfione K, Geier B, Kahol K, Ashby A. Simulation training in contemporary obstetrics education. World J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 3(2): 85-89
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v3/i2/85.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.85