Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Neurol. Aug 30, 2022; 8(1): 1-9
Published online Aug 30, 2022. doi: 10.5316/wjn.v8.i1.1
Table 2 The tabulation of the different stroke conditions of cell-free DNA assessment

Ref.
Disease specification
Source
Nucleic acid type
Outcome of the study
1Tsai et al[29], 2011Acute ischemic strokePlasmacfDNAElevated plasma cf-nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in acute ischemic stroke patients than healthy controls
2O’Connell et al[34], 2017Ischemic strokePlasmacfDNAElevated cfDNA in stroke patients relative to those diagnosed as stroke mimics (P = 0.001)
3Naumann et al[28], 2017Acute ischemic strokePlasmacfDNAIVT was associated with improved outcome in patients with cfDNA < 10000 kilogenome-equivalents/L (P < 0.05)
4Vajpeyee et al[30], 2018Acute ischemic strokePlasmaHigher cfDNA levels were associated with severity at the time of admission (P = 0.003) and poor outcome as measured by modified Rankin scale 3-mo scores (P = 0.001). Therapeutic intervention mechanical thrombectomy or IV thrombolysis associated with improved outcome in patients with cfDNA < 10000 kilogenome equivalents/L (P ≤ 0.01)
5Kananen et al[36], 2020Mortality ratePlasmacfDNAcfDNA associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.1 μg increase in cfDNA, P = 0.0003)