Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Neurol. Jun 28, 2015; 5(2): 57-63
Published online Jun 28, 2015. doi: 10.5316/wjn.v5.i2.57
Published online Jun 28, 2015. doi: 10.5316/wjn.v5.i2.57
Ref. | Definition of mild stroke | Patients | Favorableoutcome(t-PA vs Placebo) | P | SICH(t-PA vs Placebo) | P | |
rt-PA | Placebo | ||||||
NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group[14] | Score ≤ 1 on each NIHSS item and normal consciousness | 21 | 7 | 100% vs 86% | < 0.02 | 0% vs 0% | - |
Presumed small-vessel stroke | 51 | 30 | 69% vs 60% | < 0.02 | 4% vs 0% | - | |
Only motor deficits ± sensory deficits | 220 | 219 | 61% vs 46% | < 0.02 | 3% vs 0.5% | - | |
NIHSS score ≤ 9, minus all with aphasia, extinction/neglect, or any points on the level of consciousness questions | 97 | 76 | 81% vs 74% | < 0.02 | 3% vs 0% | - | |
NIHSS ≤ 9 | 99 | 78 | 82% vs 74% | < 0.02 | 3% vs 0% | - | |
Köhrmann et al[10] | NIHSS ≤ 4 | 32 | - | 94% | - | 0% | - |
Hassan et al[13] | NIHSS ≤ 6 | 27 | 24 | 92.6% vs 50% | < 0.03 | 3.7% vs 4.2% | 1 |
Hassan et al[23] | NIHSS ≤ 10 | 52 | 98 | 74% vs 34% | < 0.009 | 2% vs 3% | - |
1Steffenhagen et al[24] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 78 | 16 | 74.7% vs 81.3% | 0.75 | 2.6% vs - | 0.572 |
2Khatri et al[25] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 42 | 16 | 78.6% vs 81.3% | - | 2.4% vs 0% | - |
2Huisa et al[26] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 59 | 74 | 57.6% vs 68.9% | 0.871 | 5% | - |
3Helsinki Stroke Thrombolysis Registry[7] | NIHSS 0-2 | 58 | - | 88% | - | 0% | - |
NIHSS 3-4 | 194 | - | 86% | - | 2.6% | - | |
NIHSS 5-6 | 236 | - | 78% | - | 2.1% | - | |
Greisenegger et al[27] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 445 | 445 | 41% vs 29% | < 0.001 | 2.5% vs 0% | - |
Urra et al28] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 119 | 84 | 83% vs 81% | > 0.05 | 0% vs 0% | - |
Logallo et al[29] | NIHSS ≤ 5 | 158 | 1633 | 38% vs 31% | 0.07 | 1.9% vs 0.1% | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ji HC, Yang LT, Yan FL. Thrombolysis for mild stroke. World J Neurol 2015; 5(2): 57-63
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6212/full/v5/i2/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5316/wjn.v5.i2.57