Comparison of flow rate accuracy and consistency between the on-Q, baxter, and ambu pain infusion devices

doi:10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (11499)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

617

WORD

376

HTML

7542

Figures (1-2)

202

Tables (1-2)

190

Sum=8927

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1156

Download

1416

Sum=2572

Mar 27, 2014 (publication date) through Nov 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (8)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Anesthesiology

ISSN

2218-6182

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Anesthesiol. Mar 27, 2014; 3(1): 119-123
Published online Mar 27, 2014. doi: 10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Three pumps compared. A: On-Q pain pump; B: Baxter Multirate portable elastomeric infusion system; C: Ambu elastomeric infusion device.

Citation: LeRiger M, Bhalla T, Martin D, Bettesworth J, Tobias JD. Comparison of flow rate accuracy and consistency between the on-Q, baxter, and ambu pain infusion devices. World J Anesthesiol 2014; 3(1): 119-123
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6182/full/v3/i1/119.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119